By night I'm a writer of epic fantasy. I create exciting new worlds out of thin air and populate them with all manner of men and beasts. I dine with dwarfs, battle balrogs, and dabble in the magical arts. I am a warrior mage, a tavern brawler, and a gladiator-slave.
By day I'm a mild mannered (-ish) wildlife graduate student with a BS in zoology and over 7 years of field experience. I battle statistical software and brawl with my thesis.
My alter egos don't mingle much but one subject they can agree on is the need for thoughtful, believable beasts and monsters in fantasy writing. In fact, one of the main reasons I constantly drift back to the fantasy genre is that I love creating new critters from scratch. And I'm not the only one. Just about every fantasy, sci-fi, or horror movie that comes out has some new beast in it. But how realistic are they? How do movie monsters differ from literary beasts? Here are 3 things to think about when you create your own mythical creatures.
1. Form follows Function: "The slime coated beast stalked through the forest toward the trapped maiden, it's two-hundred eyes glowing red with hunger. She smelled it before she saw it, the creatures vile stench bringing tears to her eyes."
A Pandoran prolemur from Avatar, by Neville Page |
Ok, maybe not Hugo winning material to start with but this example passage would send up some serious red flags for a bio-geek reader such as myself. Why would an ambush predator (as stalking would imply) have glowing red eyes and a pronounced odor to announce its presence? Why would a creature that lives in a forest (a habitat with limited visibility) have two-hundred eyes? The point I'm making is that a believable creature doesn't have appendages, eyes, fur, slime, wings, odor, etc., unless there is some kind of biological reason.
Let's take a look at one of the fantastic creatures created by the genius concept artist Neville Page for the motion picture Avatar. I know from seeing the movie that he prolemur is a arboreal (tree-dwelling) forest primate. The thing is, I could have probably told you that without seeing the movie. Look at its grasping hands and feet, perfect for holding branches. Its obvious but relatively small patagium (flap of skin from the leg to the arm) means that it glides but not for long distances, probably only from tree to tree. Even the prolemurs large ears make sense in the forest, a habitat where calls go a lot further than visual cues. In summary, this creatures body form makes sense and that makes it believable.
Star Trek's monster from Delta Vega created by Neville Page |
The answer: not very. Don't get me wrong, the anatomy of this thing is awesome and it moves great but there is absolutely no way something that big, that lanky (consider the volume to surface area ratio), that hairless, could survive in that habitat. It would freeze to death, plain and simple. Also, Delta Vega appears to be a desolate frozen wasteland. So where the heck is something that big getting enough prey to move that fast for that long? The metabolics don't make sense. For a short action scene on the big screen, most viewers will be willing to suspend disbelief but if you had to paint that picture with words, it would be much harder for a careful reader to believe in that monster.
Creature concept art by Neville Page |
So do you get the picture? Are your creatures believable? Prove it! Leave a description of your fantasy beast, where it lives, and what it does and I'll give you my opinion as a biologist about whether it seems believable.
SHOW ME YOUR MONSTERS!!!
I think I cheat. I rarely create new animals, and the ones I do create are usually of a magical variety, and therefore not necessarily believable in the biological sense (because creatures escaoped froma demonic plane of existence obviously didn't evolve where we later find it...). That said, you DO make excellent points about biology. A large eared animal, for example, shouldn't really be found in an arctic waste.
ReplyDeleteI did research biomes and their usual inhabitants to help with general world-building, even without inventing creatures - to make sure I get the right animals in the right habitats - so I definitely get the point you are making!
You make a good point Ciara, sometimes fantasy breaks all the rules simply because it's fantasy. And that's part of what makes it so fun to write!
ReplyDeleteAdam,
ReplyDeleteThank you for this great post! You are a wonderful resource of knowledge to writers researching this topic. It is good to have experts out there that we can draw from for knowledge.
-Todd
The waitress might have been a looker at some point eons ago, but I can't tell for certain underneath all the frosted coral lipstick, flaking foundation and wrinkles. I’d be certain her hair colour came out of a bottle, but I just can’t believe that any company would make that shade on purpose. It’s a fascinating shade somewhere between strawberry blonde and pink lemonade. She moves with a kind of slinky shuffle, like a panther with arthritis. An incredibly old panther. This woman isn't even in cougar territory – she's a sabre tooth tiger.
ReplyDeleteoh, you meant an inhuman monster... :P
P.S. BALROG is NOT an accepted word in Scrabble. I've tried:(
Thanks Todd. I'm not sure I would use the term "expert" but I hope the post helps.
ReplyDeleteDamn Feaky, I hope you didn't write that just for this post. It's WAY too good.
ReplyDeleteAs for the under-representation of demonic creatures in Scrabble, we just have to keep up the fight for equality. Please go to www.BalrogsArePeopleToo.org to lend your support.
Naw, it's from my manuscript, but thanks:)
ReplyDeleteDid you know that there's a petition to get me inducted into the rock and roll hall of fame? I truly have some amazingly quirky friends.
Poor balrogs. I was excited too - it was a triple word score on top of a bingo. Foiled again.
That reminds me, I need to post the Zombie Apocalypse punk song I wrote this summer.
ReplyDeleteAnd of course, I'll want to hear what you think.
This is so helpful! Thanks for writing this post. I love reading informative writing advice like this.
ReplyDeleteThanks Michelle, glad you liked it.
ReplyDeleteWow, Adam! This is so cool! You're absolutely right, and I'm really glad to meet another fiction writer with as much attention to the [logical] details of creating unknown creatures (be it fantasy or sci-fi). I totally agree with everything you've said, especially no. 1.
ReplyDeleteAvatar---this reminded me of one of the things that bothered me about that movie. All larger animals have 6 limbs, except for the Na'vi. First of all, there's no evolutionary logic behind the existence of 6 limbs on a low/normal gravity planet (they're only more mass that requires energy), and second, all mammals of an ecosystem will evolve in the same gross direction in respect to basic skeletal structure, right? :)
I actually went to a museum exhibit in Seattle, WA (http://www.empmuseum.org/exhibitions/index.asp?articleID=1550) that explained just how in depth the creators of Avatar went into the biology of their creatures to make them believable. I don't remember exactly how they explained their 6-limbed critters but I remember being impressed.
DeleteThis is an awesome post. I'm going to bookmark it. I love all the weird creatures that exist and have existed at some point on earth. Nature is such a great source of inspiration.
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing.
Thanks!
DeleteAlso, AJ Hartley just posted a cool piece about monsters on Magic Words that I recommend.
http://www.magicalwords.net/really-i-mean-it/its-alive-writing-monsters/